All new & current Bike/Run/Tri/Fitness Models with GPS. Rumors + replacement dates for Garmin, Apple, Polar, Suunto, Wahoo, Samsung, Fitbit
FTC: Affiliate Disclosure: All links pay commissionReading Time: 35 minutes V2.291 – 6 December 2020 This regularly updated post gives you an indication of which GPS Run, Bike and Triathlon sports devices are available NOW, which are DISCONTINUED and which are due to be superseded. Elsewhere on this site, there are detailed opinions about specific […]

FTC: Affiliate Disclosure: All links pay commissionReading Time: 35 minutes

V2.291 – 6 December 2020

This regularly updated post gives you an indication of which GPS Run, Bike and Triathlon sports devices are available NOW, which are DISCONTINUED and which are due to be superseded. Elsewhere on this site, there are detailed opinions about specific devices, future devices and sports tech trends. Oh! and LOTS of detailed hands-on reviews on virtually all of the key run/tri watches and bike computers that you can BUY NOW.

buy Wahoo Elemnt RIVAL review specifications

Use this Index to skip to the section you want. If you are here for the first time and interested in ‘future sports devices & developments‘ then this entire post should be of interest – some of it is based on part-substantiated rumours and extrapolation of past product release cycles but I think the futures stuff will be proved to be mostly correct.

Table of Contents | Jump To

Recent New Stuff, Highlights and the INBOUND Queue

The new normality has just about kicked in. 2020 only has a little more in store for us and some of my expectations have been dashed with slippages to 2021.

The full list of ‘everything, past & future‘ is towards the end of this post for each manufacturer and here are headlines from recent months:

Black Friday Cyber Monday Deals Discount Sales





Monthly Commentary

As expected, September was a big month with lots of releases, the biggest of which was the Apple Watch 6 and Apple Watch SE. Garmin and Fitbit have both set out their competitive stalls with the Venu SQ and Versa 3/Sense respectively, many other challenger brands have set up adjacent stalls.

From a truly sporty perspective, the only news in town was the Garmin Forerunner 745 which almost every media outlet thinks is a mid-range triathlon watch. Strange. At that price and with those features it looks like a smaller Garmin 945 to me. My sense, however, is that Garmin has confused the marketing message here and there are certainly some existing Forerunner 735XT owners who have been patiently waiting to upgrade and are now bemoaning the price.

For me, the Coros Pace 2 was the other exciting release, mainly because of my interest in its market-leading STRYD support. However, close behind Coros, is the Hammerhead Karoo 2 which is now open for pre-orders. The first tranche sold out within hours. If you want to get in on the second and final tranche of pre-Christmas deliveries then you’d better check if they are open for pre-orders now. (Register At This Link:


Garmin Running & Triathlon Tech for 2020/2021

I’m not now convinced that Garmin will squeeze in the Vector 4 this side of Christmas, if true that would push the release back to Feb/March 2021. Let’s hope they designed a decent battery cap this time around.

There is very little chatter around the Forerunner 655. Maybe that will never be released? Maybe that is the one lined up for CES in Jan 2021 (I don’t think so). Perhaps there is too much crossover with the Forerunner 745 and perhaps there never be a 655 if Garmin decides to simplify its sometimes-confusing product-range.

The 745 was not THAT exciting (unless you have smaller wrists).  However, the new Venu SQ for September was interesting and signalled Garmin’s intent to properly take on the big boy (Apple SE, AW3) in the mid-priced mass market. What about the original Venu? Assuming the original Venu was sufficiently profitable then another one is due and if it doesn’t come in October then there could be a long wait until we see it. My sense is that the Venu SQ is all we will see this year from the Vivoactive/Venu smart stable.

*IF* there are now new higher-end iterations from Garmin then expect to see LTE on offer.

HRM-PRO? OK, I’m having one of those ‘I told you so’ moments. I will subtly ignore anyone who comments below and says ‘Yes, but you told us so last year‘.

Polar Vantage V2 Review Specifications
1/4 Test Guide

Suunto, Polar, Wahoo, Coros & Other Running-focussed Products

Polar released the Polar Vantage V2 to mixed reviews, I like it. Whilst superficially similar to the Vantage 1, in fact, it’s lots of new hardware and all the existing Vantage features topped up with all the new features from the Grit X. Wahoo’s new RIVAL triathlon watch promises a lot and delivered a fair bit of it already, that’s also had mixed reviews and I also like it.

I have zero intel on the existence of a Vantage M2 for the mid-market but it must be on the cards for H1.2021. However, that part of the market is highly competitive and Coros has staked their claim to it with a cheap and highly-featured product (Pace 2). So Polar need to think very carefully about what they want the M2 to be.

There’s more to come here with interesting stuff from new entrants and I’m sure you will think that some new iterations of existing products are due. I wouldn’t necessarily expect THAT much more this year.

Most of the interest over the next couple of months could come with platform announcements. We’ve seen the effective closure of MOVESCOUNT announced, lots of new Suunto stuff and some snippets from RwGPS. There is definitely more to come.

Ride with GPS | gets Heatmaps | RwGPS


Suunto Movescount – End of Life

major Suunto Updates *NOW* – firmware for models 9, 7, 5, 3


Wear OS Tech – & Similar Smarts

| Elephant | Room | The big speculation here is if, when and how Google will first introduce a Fitbit-branded (Google-owned) Wear OS watch.

I think Google has just agreed (29Sep) not to use Fitbit data for ad targetting for 10 years (and other stuff). Thus the deal should happen soon.

Putting that to one side, there are lots of Wear OS watches slated and leaked for the very near future, including the first that runs on the new generation of SnapDragon processors (4100) – that’s the TicWatch Pro 3, but others will follow and I would expect something 4100-based from Fossil only in 2021, although Fossil has to be a favourite to get a 4100 processor into at least one of its products very soon (Jan 2021 latest). NB: Fossil’s current Gen 5 runs of Qualcomm 3100 (I have one and will probably do a mini-review). Remember Fossil produces a LOT of watches and has significant resources.

What will Google do with Wear OS features or Fitbit…who knows? Neither does Fitbit! and they have made an interesting and sound move with the Fitbit Versa 3 SENSE. This is never going to kill the upcoming AW6 but it REALLY DOES give existing Versa 2 and Ionic users a REAL, GPS-enabled and feature-packed reason to upgrade. So, come back this time next year for a new “Fitbit by Google” AT THE EARLIEST.

Then again, the much-rumoured Google Pixel 2 Watch might already exist and come out in 2020. Eventually, it will be branded as a Fitbit Pixel (by Google). Just as NEST will become Google’s home hardware sub-brand so will Fitbit become Google’s health sub-brand in some form or other.

There have been mutterings of new abilities for Wear OS but they feel more like the ticklings of a feather than an earthquake. That said (edit!) November has seen an announcement for the enhancement of Wear OS’s sports recording functionality.

I still like Wear OS but using it alongside an Apple Watch 6 you realise that what also makes the Apple Watch great is the tightly engineered hardware. Wear OS is sometimes let down by being installed on poorly engineered, cheap and under-powered plastic watches. Who else makes watches for Apple’s WatchOS…no-one. It’s always going to be a good experience despite the aesthetic and logical inconsistencies you could unearth on it.

Bike Computers – A New Hope

Garmin is clearly dominant in this sector and Wahoo is clearly the main challenger brand.

Wahoo must be due a Bolt Gen 2 by now. Rumours?…nope, none. Other than an occasionally misplaced FCC filing, Wahoo is very good at keeping quiet, so don’t expect any leaks…just hope quietly.

Don’t forget that the end game for sports watches even eventually sees even Garmin losing out to Apple and Google (not for a while though). Coros might seem like the new hope right now for sports watches but their position is as precarious as everyone else even trying to catch up with cash-rich Garmin. In the bike world, it’s different, as Garmin is the behemoth that needs to be dislodged. The obvious call right now is that Wahoo can do that. They are making inroads and have products that people (including me) like and love and use. Yet Wahoo’s offering is ageing and is still not broad and deep enough to threaten Garmin’s existence despite Wahoo’s ability to chip away at Garmin’s market share.

However, we have a new kid on the block. Hammerhead. Their Karoo 2 product is a short-term Garmin-beater in many aspects. Karoo 1 users will know this already as the two products will share pretty much all the same, existing feature set that’s already been released. This time around you get a pimped up, smaller Karoo with an audible alert 😉 Don’t knock it, they are selling in boatloads already on pre-order LINK TO HAMMERHEAD PRE-ORDERS. I would consider using one as my main bike computer to replace the Bolt, let’s see.

Hammerhead Karoo 2


The “advantage” that non-Garmin companies have in the $200+ price categories is that they can be almost certain what Garmin’s product strategy will be for the next few years. They already know the awesome feature set and the not-so-bad price tags that they have to beat. How difficult is it for smaller companies to beat Garmin? Read this: How to Beat a Garmin Edge. The answer is ‘VERY‘. If there is ever some new product to beat Garmin it will likely be another device based on Android. Why?… Answer: apps and a shorter, easier product development cycle, which sounds a bit like Karoo.

I suspect that Garmin doesn’t care too much about lower price points, so Bryton, Sigma, Lezyne, CatEye, Polar and other smaller bike computer companies can fight out the price-per-feature battle in that very messy and less profitable arena.


Lists of All GPS Sports Watches & Bike Computers

This is my opinion of current & future devices across the GPS running/cycling market. Updates to this will be issued as and when information emerges which may include rumours, although please note that any information provided to me under NDA by manufacturers will *NOT* appear here and I won’t talk about it as I always honour agreements I make either written or verbal. So there will be a few more surprises over and above all of this 😉 I have at least a reasonable level of confidence that watches predicted here for the future are broadly correct – timings and functionality may NOT be what I expect. Please let me know of errors or omissions. At the end of the table is a discussion about current issues and sports tech trends. Thank you. Enjoy.

Garmin – Current and Rumoured Models

🔴 = Discontinued or effectively discontinued and replaced

🔵 = Expected Future Model or ‘very recent’.

Category Links to Review and opinion article Price Check Link Comments
Bike 🔴Edge 1000 Superseded
Bike Edge Explore Current: Jul 2018’s smaller version of the Edge 1030. Most performance features removed. Good for navigation
Bike Edge 1030  Price Check Current, Q3-Q4.2019 saw big updates to the 1030 to match the new 530/830.
🔵 Edge 1030 Plus (2020) Price Check

Price Check: Bundle

Edge 1030 Plus is June 2020
🔵 Edge 1040 (2021)
Bike Edge 20,

Edge 25

Price Check

Price Check

Entry-level cycling computer
Bike Edge 130 Price Check Entry-level cycling computer with very interesting specs. May 2018
Bike 🔵 Edge 130 Plus Price check

Price Check: MTB Bundle

Price Check: HRM Bundle

🔵 Edge 140 (2021)
🔴 Edge 200,

Edge 500,

Price Check
Bike 🔴  Edge 510 Price Check Effectively Discontinued
Bike 🔴  Edge 520 Price Check Still a great cycling computer and getting CHEAPER but a bit slow with no maps
Bike Edge 520 PLUS Current. Updated hardware capability (CIQ3), maps and software. Replaced by faster 530
Bike Edge 530 Price Check Available May 2019
🔵 Edge 530 Plus Spring 2021
Edge 540 540 could be Spring 2021
Bike 🔴 Edge 800, 810 Effectively Discontinued
Bike Edge 820 Price Check Top-end, medium-sized, nav cycling computer. Dodgy screen. Replaced by 830
Bike Edge 830 Price Check Available May 2019
🔵 Edge 830 Plus Spring 2021
Edge 840 840 could be Spring 2021
Bike 🔵 Edge MTB (something more than the 530 MTB bundle) There are gaps in the market here at least two price points. It could be filled by Garmin – just like the Instinct did for budget outdoors.
This MIGHT be the planned ENDURO for 2020. Or Enduro might be something completely different.
Outdoors 🔴 Epix Nice But Effectively Discontinued and replaced by Fenix 5X
Outdoors 🔴 Fenix, Fenix 2, Quatix Price Check Effectively Discontinued, not as good as subsequent models.
Outdoors 🔴 Fenix 3 Fenix 3 HR + variants Price Check 

Price Check 3HR

Current, still great devices
Outdoors Fenix 5 PLUS, 5s PLUS, 5x PLUS Price Check

Price Check 5S Plus

Price Check 5X Plus

Garmin’s flagship model for 2018-2019. These are notably updated Fenix 5 models.  Superseded in with better hardware in the Fenix 6.
Outdoors Fenix 5, Fenix 5s, Fenix 5x Price Check 5

Price Check 5x

Price Check 5s

Garmin’s flagship model for 2017-2018. Caveat Emptor. The Plus version is the one you want to buy NOT these…
Outdoors Tactix Bravo (disc), Tactix Charlie, Tactix Delta (2020), Descent MK1, D2 Bravo, D2 Charlie, Quatix, D2 Delta (& S and PX) Solar & Sapphire ‘military’/hunting, diving, aviation variants of Fenix 5
Outdoors 🔵 Fenix 6,  Price Check
Fenix models are 6S (Base, Sapphire and Pro), 6 (Base, Sapphire and Pro) 6x (Pro and Solar)
🔵 Tactix Delta, D2 Echo,
🔵 Descent MK2i (Q4.2020)
Quatix 6 (2020)
🔵 D2 Delta (base, sapphire, solar)
🔵 Fenix 6 (further Solar and Sport variants for 2020)
Outdoors 🔵 Fenix 7 Q4.2020-Q3.2021 (latter much more likely)
Outdoors 🔴 Fenix Chronos Price Check Quality innards. F5s firmware. Expensive. Replaced by the MARQ.
Outdoors MARQ (effectively Fenix Chronos 2) Announced. the MARQ range is the Fenix range in a fancy shell eg MARQ ATHLETE is a 945 in an expensive shell.
Aviator (aero), Captain (marine), Athlete (multi-sport), Expedition (Hike/Outdoors), Driver (car).
🔵MARQ Commander 1 Oct2019.
Outdoors 🔵 MARQ2/CHRONOS3 Q4.2020-Q1.2021
Outdoors Instinct Price Check Oct 2018 A cut-down outdoors-focussed Fenix.
🔵  Instinct Solar (plus Tactical, Camo and Surf versions) Price Check Jul 2020
The Instinct Tactical edition is now available and differs only with the NIGHT VISION and STEALTH modes, as well as the JUMPMASTER profile. August 2019 TACTICAL COYOTE edition
Outdoors Instinct 2 (possibly SOLAR version) Due in 2021. This WILL come as the Instinct is popular.
Run 🔴 Forerunner 210, Forerunner 220, Forerunner 225 Effectively Discontinued
Run 🔴 Forerunner 230 Probably won’t be replaced. Effectively Discontinued.
Run 🔴 Forerunner 235 Price Check Replacement 245 & 245M released
Run 🔴 Forerunner 235L Apr 2018’s cut-down version for the Chinese market.
Run Forerunner 245 & Forerunner 245 Music Current
🔵 Forerunner 255 (2021)
Run 🔴Forerunner 25 Price Check Entry-level run/sports watch
Run 🔴 Forerunner 30 Entry-level run/sports watch
Run 🔴 Forerunner 35 Price Check Entry-level run/sports watch
Run Forerunner 45, 45S Current, Announced April 2019

R45 Plus, due August 2020

Forerunner 45 Plus
🔵 Forerunner 55 (2021)
Run 🔴 Forerunner 610, Forerunner 620 Effectively Discontinued but good enough
Run 🔴 Forerunner 630 Great device, superseded
Run Forerunner 645 and 645M Current.
🔵 Forerunner 655 (2020) 655 Overdue
Run/Tri Forerunner 735XT Current, great mid-range tri watch (no barometer). it’s the last remaining CIQ2 device hence next to be replaced
Run/Tri 🔵 Forerunner 745 (745XT suffix will be dropped) September 2020, top-end smaller tri watch
Run/Tri 🔴 Forerunner 910XT Great tri watch in its day, still good enough if you can find one
Run/Tri 🔴Forerunner 920XT Price Check Great tri watch…all you need really. Sometimes CHEAP
Run/Tri Forerunner 935 Still a Top tri watch, no gimmicks
Run/Tri 🔵 Forerunner 945  Top Tri Watch, gimmicks
🔵 Forerunner 955, my guess would be for Xmas 2020 or Spring 2021
🔵 Forerunner 955 LTE, yup it WILL happen
Fitness 🔴 Vivoactive Price Check Effectively Discontinued
Fitness Vivoactive 3 A contender to Fitbit Ionic and Apple Watch 3
Fitness Vivoactive 3 MUSIC, Vivoactive 3M VA3 with music. Q2.2018
Fitness Vivoactive 3 Plus Music LTE Verizon Jan-19
Fitness Vivoactive 4 & 4S with a great AMOLED screen on the top-end VA4 called VENU. Sep-19

23 Sep 2020

Venu SQ

Venu Plus to follow?

🔵 Vivoactive 5 (2021, possibly 2020 if now moved to annual release cycle)
Fitness 🔴 Vivoactive HR Great device, effectively Vivoactive 2, replaced by Vivoactive 3
Fitness �Vivofit 2, Vivofit 3, Vivofit 4 December 2017: supersedes VivoFit 3. Vivofit 5 due for Xmas 2019.
Fitness 🔴 Vivomove Price Check Dress watch, superseded September 2017
Fitness 🔴 Vivomove HR Current Sept 2017
Fitness 🔵 Vivomove 3 / 3s /Style / Luxe Sep-19
Swim 🔴 Swim Effectively Discontinued
Swim 🔵 Swim 2 Oct-19
Swim Swim 3 2022?


Polar, Suunto, Wahoo, Fitbit, Apple, etc – Current and Rumoured Models

CategoryLinks to either a review, opinion article or your local AmazonLinkComments

Manufacturer Category Review, opinion article Links Price Check Link Comments
adidas Run 🔴Smart Run Discontinued
Amazfit (Xiaomi-Huami) Run Bip (#A1608 – Bip S Supercedes) Price Check Current products
Pace (#A1612, #A1602) Price Check
Bip Lite (#A1915)
Bip S (2020)
Ares (Rugged, hexagonal Bip, May 2020)
Xiaomi Mi Watch Color (2020), plus sports edition
Amazfit (Xiaomi-Huami) Run Pace 2 Pace 2 is Stratos. The only difference between the Chinese (A1609 Amazfit Pace 2) and the International version (A1619 Amazfit Stratos) is the firmware.
Amazfit Stratos 2 means Stratos (A1619)
Amazfit (Xiaomi-Huami) Fitness Verge, Verge Lite, Current model A1811 (Lite #A1818), as over 1 Dec 2018 now selling in the USA. Verge 2 / Nexo imminent with eSIM.
 Verge 2 / Nexo
🔵 GTR, GTR2 GTR2 released Aug2020
🔵GTS  , GTS2 GTS2 announced Aug 2020, it’s their version of the apple watch
🔵Neo Garmin Instinct rip off Aug 2020
Amazfit (Xiaomi-Huami) Run/Tri 🔴STRATOS 1/2 Current, Multisport 2018 watch. Intl versions v1 & v2 are same.
🔵STRATOS 3 STRATOS 3 Aug 2019 – model #A1929
Huami Amazfit T-Rex – model #A1919,
Apple Fitness 🔴Watch Series 1 (Sport), Current, great pricing on the AW3 beware inferior hardware compared to AW4.
🔴 Watch Series 2 w/Nike,
Series 3 GPS+Cellular, 
Apple Fitness 🔴 Watch Series 4 w/Nike Current. A notable hardware upgrade from the AW3. Discontinued
Apple Fitness 🔵 Watch Series 5 Aluminium, stainless steel, titanium and ceramic versions as well as the 40mm and 44mm versions. Also a Nike co-branded version.
Apple Fitness 🔵 Watch Series 6

🔵 Watch Series SE

Apple Watch Series 7 – Sep 2021


Runs Watch OS7

Watch OS8 due Summer 2021, Watch7 might bring a circular watch face or sliders to replace the crown


Bontrager Bike TREK Ride Time Elite, Trip 300, Bontrager Garmin Edge 1030 low spec own-branded devices and Bontrager-branded Garmin device
Bryton Bike RIDER 100, 310, 330, 410, 450h, 530E, Rider 530 T, aero 60, one, Rider 860, Rider 420 Current, 450E is top model @<$200 with all functions even 310 @<$150 supports a PM (Full model list here). Aero 60 is a fully-featured bikenav. The Sep 2019 Rider 860 and Rider 420 might see the 860 as the new top-end model built on Android – a first for Bryton
Bryton Bike RIDER numerous other models Effectively Discontinued
Casio Outdoors Pro Trek Smart WSD-F20 Current, replaced by F20/F30 announced Aug 2018
Casio Fitness Pro Trek Smart WSD-F21 HR Sep 2019. Updated F20 with oHR
Casio Outdoors Pro Trek Smart WSD-F30 Announced: Jan 2019, replacing WSD-F20. Expect a WSD-F40 in Jan 2020 😉
Casio Outdoors Casio G-Shock Move GBD-H1000
CatEye Bike STEALTH 50, Stealth EVO, STEALTH EVO, STRADA, PADRONE Smart+, Stealth evo+ CC-GL51 (2015), full spec’d Aventura 2016 models are current (full model list here), Avventura might only be available in Japan
COROS Run/Tri Pace Multisport M1 Current, Garmin 735XT lookalike
Pace 2 2020 should see an update of the Pace, as Coros return to revisit their road running roots
COROS Run/Tri Apex 42mm 46mm Current Oct 2018. Highly credible endurance run and tri alternative. Competent small format is available. Jan 2019 a special edition announced for 46mm.
COROS Run/Tri Apex PRO Q4.2019 Somewhere between Apex and Vertix
COROS Outdoors Vertix Current May 2019. Premium case and SpO2
CooSpo Bike BC200 Current (hey! they made the effort to include power meter support, I made the effort to include it in this list, I’ve no idea who they are)
Epson Run/Tri 🔴ProSense 17, 🔴ProSense 57, 🔴ProSense 307, 🔴ProSense 347 Discontinued
Fossil Fitness WearOS Sport Nov-18
Fitbit Fitness 🔴Blaze Price Check Replaced by Versa
Fitbit Fitness 🔴Charge, Charge 2 Discontinued
Fitbit Fitness Charge 3 Price Check Current
Fitbit Fitness 🔴Versa, Current SE version has Fit Pay payments
🔵 Versa 2 Versa Lite – March 2019
Versa 2 – available 15 September 2019 with Aug 28th Announcement
Versa 3 / Versa 3 SENSE September 2020
Fitbit Fitness 🔴Charge HR (Band) Discontinued, replaced by Charge 2, Charge 3, Charge 4 (2020).
Fitbit Fitness Ionic Current, September 2017
Fitbit Fitness Ionic 2 Overdue, might never happen
Fitbit Fitness Ionic Adidas Announced Feb 2018, has an Adidas app
Fitbit Fitness 🔴Surge Superseded by Ionic
Fossil Fitness WearOS Puma SmartWatch Sep 2019 (Prob same watch inside as the Fossil sport)
Michael Kors MKGO Sep 2019 (Prob same watch inside as the Fossil sport)
Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3 Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3
Fossil Fitness Sport Sport Uses 2019 Snapdragon processor. Fossil is a BIG WearOS watch producer for many sub-brands. Sport uses a new 3100 processor.
Fossil Fitness WearOS Gen 5 Still 3100 chipset but looks sweet and runs smoothly enough
Giant Bike NeosTrack Cycling Computers. The NeosTrack is a reasonably high-spec model.
Neos ANT+
Google Fitness WearOS Pixel Smartwatch To be released in 2020 maybe. Unclear if a SPORT/FITNESS version will be released as well.
Decathlon Bike BC900 Cycling Computer, records power
iGSPORT Bike iGSPORT iGS618 Cycling Computer, I think these guys are owned by Xiaomi and could be one to watch at the budget end
Hammerhead Bike Karoo Feb 2018.
Expect even more significant firmware updates throughout 2020
Hammerhead Bike Karoo 2 Cycling Computer, small format, Xmas 2020
Huawei Fitness WearOS Fit, Watch 2 Sport, Watch GT Active Price Check WearOS and a good spec. Current (Watch 2 was 2017 with an incremental 2018 update) The Fit was effectively the “Watch 1 Sport”.
Watch Gt2e Watch 3 Watch GT and this was codenamed FORTUNA (GT is not WearOS anymore)
Huawei Fitness WearOS Honor Magic WearOS and a good spec, November 2018
Huawei Sport ?WearOS? Honor GS Pro/Kanon Q4.2020, TomTom map partnership could be interesting
Huawei Proprietary Android? Watch Fit
Lezyne Bike Mini, Macro Plus GPS (Macro, Macro Easy, Micro, Micro Watch, Super Pro (Super GPS), Mega, Watch variants MEGA announced July 2018
MACRO EASY GPS announced Jul 2019
Macro Plus & Super Pro are revamped from earlier models, announced Jul 2019 with FE-C…cheap, sturdy and highly featured.
Full, current list here
LG Fitness WearOS Watch Sport Price Check Current, apparently one of the better WearOS devices – certainly spec looks the best. Watch2 has seen e-sim in China only
LG Fitness WearOS LM-W315, LM-305, LM-W325, LM-W319, LM-W315 could be called ICONIC. With one of the other models being the ICONIC SPORT. LM-W319 could be as soon as Sep 2018 (likely this is now the W7 which is a non-sports hybrid.) but a Watch3 derivative will be 2019.
Mont Blanc Fitness WearOS Summit 2 Announced – several quite advanced sporty features
MIO/MiTAC/Magellan Bike Cyclo 605,  Nice devices. The 505HC appears to now be discontinued and replaced with a slightly superior 605HC (Q2.2017). Other models include Cyclo 210 (re-announced Aug2018?), 400, 405, 405HC, Discover/Plus (May 2020)
Discover Unsure of the situation in USA with sister company MAGELLAN. Who have dated ECHO/SWITCH run/bike products
Discover Plus
🔴505HC+ others
Mio Labs Running 🔴 Mio Alpha 2 revolutionary at the time
Mio Labs Running/Triathlon mioEXP First sports watch in a loooong time by Mio. in fact since about 2015. Triathlon focussed and looking good for Q4.2020
Misfit Fitness WearOS Vapor Price Check WearOS. Replaced by Vapor 2
Misfit Fitness WearOS Vapor 2 WearOS. Current.
MiVia Fitness Run 350 2017 Fitbit Versa look-alike
Mobvoi Fitness Ticwatch 2 aka Ticwatch Active 2017 budget sports watch with GPS & Music
Mobvoi Fitness WearOS Ticwatch E2 2018 budget sports watch with GPS & Music, the replacement for Ticwatch E
Mobvoi Fitness WearOS Ticwatch S2 CES2019 replacement for Ticwatch S (ie S1). S=Sport
Mobvoi Fitness WearOS Ticwatch S 2017 WearOS 2.0 budget sports watch. Ticwatch E is cheaper and non-sport version. Ticwatch 2, Active and Classic are different – not WearOS. Replaced by S2.
Mobvoi Fitness WearOS Ticwatch Pro

Ticwatch Pro 3

WearOS 2.0, Pro 3 has snapdragon 4100
🔵 Ticwatch Pro 4G LTE

🔵 new Ticwatch Pro  Jul 2019 with LTE (USA only). Bad GPS…avoid.

Moto Fitness WearOS Current
360 Sport – 2nd Gen/Sport Price Check
Gen 3 November 2019
New Balance Fitness WearOS RunIQ WearOS. Current
Omata Bike Omata One Price Check Trendy Bike Computer Current
OnePlus Fitness Likely WearOS Probably due Q4.2020, probably based heavily on the Oppo Watch
Oppo Fitness Android

Fitness Wear OS


Watch (Wear OS Version)

Looks like an Apple Watch very limited EU/USA availability as of July 2020. Based on Android

Wear OS version released 31 Jul 2020

Ordnance Survey Bike OS Horizon GPS High-quality MAPS on a bikenav
OS Trail Bike GPS
OS Trail 2 Bike GPS (2019)
Polar Bike V660 V650 refresh 2020? Overdue
Polar Run/Tri Vantage V

Vantage V2

V800 replacement
There are no published plans to take the features any further. Polar will fix bugs though.
V2 new for October 2020
Who knows if they will iterate either the hardware or software.
Polar Run/Tri Vantage V Titanium high-end case variant of the Vantage V
Polar Run/Tri/Outdoors Grit X Polar Grit X – outdoors version of Vantage V
Polar Run/Tri Vantage M

Vantage M2

More run-focussed than the V model and a bit more than the M430.
I’m not convinced there will be a Vantage M lite model ie something to theoretically replace the M200. Looks like the Ignite/Unite covers that.
No intel on the M2. My guess would be Q1.2021
Polar Fitness A370 A360 replacement with linked-GPS
Polar Fitness A380  I guess you could speculate that there is an A380 due but I would not be so sure that Polar (or anyone else beyond Garmin/Fitbit) will pursue a premium band format.
Polar Fitness 🔵  Ignite Fitness & Running watch. With GPS. Scope for a 3Fitness-like model with no GPS. Scope also to beef up the shell quality a little.
Polar Run M200 Entry-level oHR running/sports watch 2016. Replacement due in 2020 maybe? M200 looks out-of-date
Polar Run 🔴M400 Replaced by M430 in Q1.2017
Polar Run M430 An optical M400, released. this is mostly replaced by the Vantage M, although the Vantage M has notable extra stuff kinda making it a model higher. M430 has been confirmed as remaining in the Polar product set as a full-featured running watch BUT it will not receive new functionality.
M430 looks out-of-date
Polar Bike 🔴M450 Replaced by M460 in Q1.2017
Polar Bike M460 M450 with STRAVA LIVE. M460 looks out-of-date
Polar Run WearOS M600 WearOS sports watch for Android
Polar Bike V650 A good Bike Nav Cycling device. Might get an ANT+ refresh but fine as-is. Does Polar want to go down the route of giving this proper onboard maps?
Polar Run/Tri 🔴V800 One of the greatest multisport watches of all-time, replaced by Vantage
Samsung Fitness 🔴Gear Sport Price check Current (Gear Fit Pro is BAND format and the Samsung Gear Fit Plus could be the 2018 version of that)
Samsung Fitness 🔴Galaxy Watch Active Galaxy Sport is Galaxy Watch Active
Samsung Fitness 🔵 Galaxy Watch Active2 Jul-19
Galaxy Watch2 (never existed)
Galaxy Watch3 (SM-R840) Aug 2020 (Samsung Galaxy Watch Active3 to follow?)
Sigma Sport Bike Rox GPS 7.0, ROX GPS 10.0, Rox GPS 11.0, Rox 12.0 Sport, id.TRI, id.FREE Good feature set, current.
Rox 12.0 Sport June 2018 looks like a massive leap forward for the company. Highly competent bikenav
id.TRI is a very interesting budget TRI offering
Full list of Sigma products here
Skagen Fitness WearOS Falster 2 With GPS & oHR added, this now counts as a sports watch. It aims to be seen as the prettiest WearOS
Falster 3 Falster 3 uses the fastest processor
Sony Fitness WearOS Smartwatch 3 SWR50 Price Check WearOS. Current
SoWatch Fitness SoWatch IndieGogo – Sports and other stuff
Pioneer BIKENAV SGX-CA500, SGX-CA600 Cycling Computer, looks nice. OSM, ANT+, power
Full list here
Specialized Bike  SpeedZone Sport / SpeedZone II Basic Cycling Computers
SRM Bike PowerControl 7 (PC7) / 8 (PC8) Cycling Computer
Stages Bike Dash (L10) Cycling Computer. cheap and well-featured
Stages Bike Dash L50, M50 New models for release Q1-2.2019
Suunto Various Ambit 3 variants (Peak, run, Sport…) Still great devices. In many ways superior.
Suunto Various Ambit 4 The SPARTAN TRAINER is the replacement to the AMBIT3, at least in terms of looks.
Suunto Various 🔴 Ambit/Ambit 2 Effectively Discontinued
Suunto Run/Tri 🔴 SPARTAN Sport Current, OK to buy now
Suunto Run/Tri 🔴 SPARTAN Sport with oHR (WHR) Current
Suunto Outdoors 🔴 Spartan Sport Wrist HR Baro Current
Suunto Run/Tri 🔴 SPARTAN Trainer New outdoor variants in Jan 2018, superseded in 2019 with Suunto 5
Suunto Outdoors 🔴 SPARTAN Ultra Current, OK to buy now. Suunto 9 is an effective replacement
Suunto Fitness Suunto 3 Current. A low-end model with interesting specs. GPS only from paired and carried smartphone.
🔴 Suunto 3 Fitness The Suunto 3 dropped the FITNESS suffix in 2020 and DOES have very slightly different hardware
Suunto Fitness Suunto 9 Current. High-end Spartan ULTRA replacement. My GUESS is that this will iterate next in some way in 2021 (no intel)
Suunto Fitness Suunto 7 Wear OS Smart sports watch
Suunto will likely now iterate bi/tri-annual versions of 3/5/7/9
Suunto Run/Tri 🔵 Suunto 5 Good mid-range tri watch. Replacement for SPARTAN Trainer. Due a refresh in 2021
Tag Heuer Fitness Connected Gen 1 Wear OS on snapdragon 3100 and a big price tag. yet still a smart fitness watch
Connected Gen 2
Connected Gen 3
Timex Run/tri IronMan R300 #Sigh
TomTom Run 🔴 Adventurer TomTom sports division is closed down. Firmware updates as of 8 May 2018
🔴 Runner 3, Spark 3
TomTom Run 🔴 Spark, Runner, Runner 2 Effectively Discontinued, there was never a Spark 2
Vivo Smart Watch Smartwatch running FunOS, from BKK who own Oppo, Realme and One Plus.
Withings Fitness Move & Move ECG CES2019, Sweet Fitness ecosystem
Withings Fitness Steel HR Sport Current
Wahoo Fitness Bike ELEMNT A great cycling computer, due a refresh
Wahoo Fitness Bike ELEMNT BOLT A great cycling computer, due a refresh
Wahoo Fitness Bike ELEMNT ROAM Colour version of a super-sized Bolt with navigation
Wahoo Fitness Bike ELEMNT MINI Cut down cycling computer no GPS, no power compatibility, Wahoo-only sensors. Due a refresh but unlikely
Wahoo Fitness Run/Tri ELEMNT RIVAL A mid-tier, mass-market triathlon watch
XPLOVA/Acer Bike 🔴 G3, G5, E5, E7 Effectively discontinued
XPLOVA/Acer Bike X3 EVO Current, FYI they are releasing a turbo trainer Q3.2019
XPLOVA/Acer Bike 🔴X5 Superseded by X5 EVO
XPLOVA/Acer Bike X5 EVO Current, refreshed model. onboard video, guess there’ll be an X6 next…
Zepp Smart Fitness Watch Zepp E

Zepp Z

Zep E: 2x Apple watch wannabes

Zep Z: likely sports watch



  • There are many other low-priced brands, several of which are visual rip-offs of the main brands’ models.
  • Some low-priced brands include PARNERME, UWEAR, GoLife, GooPhone, Reabeam, FitCare, iGPSport
  • There are probably also some Kickstarter and Indegogo type new models planned. My broad opinion is that if this is the first sports watch from a company with no track record then you will lose your money or, at best, receive a pile of junk. Spend a little bit extra and instead get a real product now.
  • If you’ve found a brand that I’ve not listed above and the price looks too good to be true…there’s probably a reason. Just go for the brands above…eg Lezyne & Bryton offer cheap and perfectly good bike computers that support complex usage.

What have I missed? Are there others?

Note: information that has become available about accessories is NOT included here as there are too many of them to keep up-to-date with. There are also too many Power Meter variants for me to keep track of. I have more than a passing interest in PMs for triathlon disciplines but I don’t keep an eye on the whole market – the document I keep up-to-date on PM is my guide to the best power meter. I’m generally going to exclude wrist bands from the lists above, like the Vivokids v2, although some bands have sneaked in there already.

Lists of all Firmware Updates

Please let me know of any I’ve missed

Also useful for checking compatibility and new ANT+ devices. VERY occasionally you might see a special ‘leak’ appear here first by accident.

Sports Watch Tech Trends?

The big trend is ‘not here guv‘….the smart VC money is now in MEDICAL-WEARABLE tech rather than sports wearable tech, there are numerous obvious exceptions but that is a general and strong trend as evidenced by the Fitbit Versa 3 SENSE

The following sections cover the major feature trends that affect endurance sports devices as I see them. You will find that there are general thrusts forwards in watch tech which are lagging slightly behind smartphone tech and that there are also sports-specific innovations that can likely only ever happen on watches. Some of the trends are technical trends eg for ‘LTE’ but then the technical trend itself also enables new services & features to be provided on it eg LTE will support instantaneous location-based functionality which could be useful during a race to show performance stats of competitors centrally

Screen Tech

Apple Watch/WearOS and others already have high resolution screens but no ‘proper’ sports watches do…yet.

AMOLED / transflective is coming to a sports watch near you. Garmin’s VENU is the start and it will end with AMOLED-like tech on VERY MANY sports watches. You might have to wait up to 4 more years though for it to be widespread. Power usage is the issue holding it all back.

Connectivity Tech

WiFi will get ever faster but that won’t really impact sports devices too much.

Bluetooth and ANT+ will keep doing their thing and Bluetooth will eventually win despite not being as good for sports. Fortunately, that will be in MANY years time. So no need to worry yet.

Multiple Bluetooth connections will continue to be created on devices eg Polar H10 has 2x BLE connections and Wahoo Tickr Gen 2 has three, Wahoo’s KICKR18 now has 3x BLE connections in the latest firmware (not KICKR17 grrr) Multiple ANT+ connections are of course possible on every ANT+ device

LTE/Cellular connectivity is where most innovation will take place and several smartwatch makers, along with Garmin, have dabbled with this on smartwatches. I’m expecting this to become more prevalent from 2020 onwards on SPORTS watches and data-SIM-only companies like MOKANIX are trying to build a business on trends like that. Don’t necessarily expect your watch’s SIM to be able to make or take phone calls…sounds crazy? maybe not, they could just be used in sports to add extra in-exercise connectivity effectively allowing more serious athletes to avoid carrying their phone if they want to transmit their progress, then, of course, this could enter into the realms of usefulness for the live screening of stats of professional sportspeople.

There’s a good chance that LTE/Cellular innovation will be one of Garmin’s key features that trickle-down once they have populated options from all the top-end running and cycling devices.

Payment Tech /NFC

This works well on all the devices I’ve used that support it (Garmin, Fitbit, Apple, others).

The difficulty for Garmin is it needs to explicitly support your bank – ie the chances are it won’t work in that sense! If you use Wear OS/WatchOS then they have generic support for Mastercard, Visa and Amex but not in every GEO.

AFAIK it’s not possible to use PayPal/Stripe/BitCoin with Garmin/Wear OS/Watch OS. Which is a pain as, for example, I’d like to be able to easily handle multiple currencies in my Paypal balances.

Music Tech

Music Services: Garmin has commercially ‘nailed’ music whilst exercising by enabling the integration of AMAZON music, Spotify and Deezer. When I say ‘nailed’ I mean that their offering has a potentially wide appeal as it supports multiple services with the ability to relatively easily add others in the future. Audible, Apple Music and Google Play Music (now YouTube Music) still need to be added to Garmin. I suspect that at least one of those won’t happen!

Geographic constraints: All music services are constrained by regional licencing differences. Depending on exactly where you are, this could be a real pain…or not.

None of the vendors’ offerings works as a true, generic streaming service. Instead, they use Bluetooth phone connections or domestic WiFi to cache your tracks on your watch from streaming services. Once LTE/ Cellular connectivity is supported over larger populations we might see proper/live streaming, although the current way of working suits me.

High definition music playback is NOT supported from any smartwatch that I know eg one using AptX HD. AFAIK they all use normal-quality CODECS and have other audio-tech constraints which mean that your running with music capability can sound GOOD but not EXCELLENT. And your sports watch cannot stream a high-quality music signal to high-quality Bluetooth speakers at home – over Wifi it might be possible (IDK).


Support for multiple GNSS constellations just means that you can use more satellites. That means that you will only have an increased likelihood of getting +/-5m accuracy

To get that elusively-accurate GPS running track other things need to fall into place.

  • Some of the individual constellations already support multiple frequencies (bands) of transmissions. If receivers use two of these frequencies (dual band) then that can eliminate one of the major errors on the signal travelling through the atmosphere. Dual-band Galileo might deliver that and is used in some smartphones now. This can, in theory, give +/-1m accuracy (GPS+Galileo is NOT dual-band per se, Galileo has 3 bands, not all of which are used). I believe that even the BEIDou-3 constellation is now complete and has global coverage but that only has +/- 10m accuracy for public usage.
  • HOWEVER, the aerial needs to be up to the job. A watch aerial typically just points up. But a better aerial might also point down and to the side towards buildings so that it can know if it receives a bounced signal or a direct signal. The bounced signal always travels further and currently, these confuse your watch and make it think you are a few metres away from where you really are.
  • It’s possible that some sort of ground-based station can correct positional errors (Google: SBAS) and, maybe, combining satellite signals with urban WiFi networks or nationwide cellular masts can deliver better accuracy in urban areas #Maybe but I doubt it.
  • GPS III 3 sounds one better than GPS 2. But all these things, above, equally need to fall into place first for GPS III to deliver.
  • Dual-band (meaning dual-frequency) GNSS IS live on several smartphones, there is now a dual-band Sony GNSS chip (Aug 2020) and signal augmentation with ground-based stations (SBAS) is used on sports watches eg Polar VANTAGE

We should soon see (2021) the first watches with both dual-band/frequency AND dual-GNSS eg GPS+Galileo using L1+L5 (technical…sorry!)

However, I suspect these technologies will still not give the accuracy some runners want. Mathematical modelling and signal-correlation techniques should be able to be used to boost the accuracy of GPS in many scenarios including in buildings and urban canyons – for example, to determine which signals are reflected and which are direct. The first commercial products should appear by mid-2021 claiming sub-1m levels of accuracy.

So my personal take here (which may be wrong) is that the problem to be solved is that of determining which signal are direct and which reflected (and then combine that with a good antenna and a good power consumption mode)


Optical HR Tech

We are just about there with oHR delivering resting HRV. Or at least it’s possible. This then means that all vendors should be able to deliver a good SLEEP offering based on sensible sleep-based HRV data.

Beyond that, I can’t see anyone consistently delivering oHR accuracy to, say, +/-3% for >90% of athletes using existing tech whilst exercising. The best I’ve seen so far, for me, is the Apple Watch 6.

I suspect some mythical new tech is needed to boost accuracy, although I think it’s called a chest strap 😉

Elevation Tech

In my mind, Garmin has mostly nailed this with Digital Elevation Maps (DEM) ie a map that has the known elevations of every square metre of the earth (or whatever the actual resolution).

Couple that with algorithms that fine-tune by barometric-altimetry and GPS-altimetry and we’re there. Well, unless you’re on a steep cliff face or in a built-up area. But it’s great for nearly all of us, nearly all of the time.

The problem is the cost and complexity of doing this for a smaller company. #BarrierToEntry. Those that care sufficiently about elevation (some cyclists) will probably just buy a Garmin, so is it worth new entrants trying to implement maps and DEM? If you implement maps you probably will want to implement routing at the same time and that is HARD.

  • GPS location – the watch measures the distance to several satellites and works out your elevation
  • Barometric altimetry – uses pressure changes to measure elevation changes. Might require calibration to known elevations at known GPS points (eg you departure point)
  • GPS+Barometric – Uses both of the above. Can be good as sometimes a GPS signal can be rubbish and sometimes barometric pressure changes because of weather rather than elevation changes! (doh). The Apple Watch 6 seems to have nailed this by PROPERLY & periodically keeping the current elevation always checked with GPS (it might do that indoors over WiFi as it knows the location/elevation of your home). Once the starting point is correctly calibrated it becomes easier for a barometric altimeter to keep track of your workout elevation changes simply through air pressure and, perhaps, less frequent GPS-adjustment. My understanding is that mostdevices take MANY MINUTES to get a 3D GPS fix for starting elevation and that process is different from the quick 2-D GPS fix you get through A-GPS (most devices have that)
  • DEM – the watch has an onboard map. For each GPS point, the elevation is known on the map. So long as the GPS point is reasonably accurate then the elevation will be correct (hills and urban areas are obvious problem areas)

Environmental Profiling

We have seen the rise of physiology insights into your performance (physiological profiling). Essentially that is based on the knowledge of your time-in-zone (HR and power) and HRV. That’s pretty much it with a bit of accelerometer magic thrown in. There is much more scope to improve that.

Environmental profiling is different and is looking at the impact of the environment on your performance. So we might look at the impact of surface conditions, wind, temperature, altitude, humidity and gradient. “What’s new here?” you might ask. You might cite the examples of Normalized Graded Pace, Garmin’s Heat Acclimation and Altitude Acclimatisation along with STRYD adjusting power to take into account wind. Fair enough. You might also cite examples of Polar and Garmin looking at hill performances with the latter releasing ClimbPro in 2018 (IIRC) and Polar releasing Hill Splitter on the Grit X in 2020.

But much more is still to be done here.

  • For example, Garmin’s ClimbPro relies on the knowledge of your future route to produce the elevation profile of the upcoming hill. Surely popularity routing or your personal routing history could be used to predict the upcoming elevation profile of your most likely route for the numerous occasions when you do not follow a route?
  • For example, a whole raft of analyses could be applied to hills if each hill was automatically identified and recorded as some form of lap (like Hill Splitter from Polar and Suunto new features)
  • For example, similar analyses could be applied to your TRUE efforts if they were auto-identified as laps. You might not start and stop your intervals at the precise time and even 3 seconds will make a difference to how you analyse you 3:35/km rep performances. Even running laps, your true efforts might last for 405m on one lap and for 398m on the next lap…yet both efforts are recorded as 400m
  • For example, muscle oxygen states could be specifically examined (again as laps) to see how much your performance deteriorates.
  • For example, some analysis software already automatically picks out STRAVA segment performances (as laps) that are already stored in your FIT/TCX files (Golden Cheetah does this for Hills and Matches too)

Garmin’s Heat Acclimatisation is partly environmental profiling and partly physiological profiling.

Battery Tech

I said elsewhere that Garmin has reached “peak battery” I don’t know how they’ve done it. Coros is good too. Either way, their batteries last for a LONG time. WAY longer than almost any of us need them to. OK, so the reality is that the battery lives are not as good as advertised once you start connecting all your sensors and navigating, getting lost and playing music but the battery life problem seems to have a workable end-game in sight.

Solar tech will spread through Garmin’s ranges down to cheaper watches and eventually across to bike computers branded as “Power Glass”. Others amongst us will just take a battery pack. It’s tricky to see who else will try to seriously implement Solar tech, is there any point in a smartwatch company boosting their day-long battery life by a few 10s of minutes? a: No

Consequently now is the time to start introducing lots of battery-eating functions again! #Sigh !! (Yes I’ll use them too!). And yes that WILL mean introducing awesome screens on SPORTS watches.

Wireless charging and shared charging between devices might come to a watch near you. Or not. Charging based on body heat might perhaps spread more widely (eg Matrix Gemini TEG)

The ‘next big thing’ could be GRAPHENE battery tech in 2022/23 or solid state batteries.

Voice Tech

Many running watch vendors have half-decent support for audio feedback during workouts. If you listen to music you may find yourself inadvertently ALSO hearing your 1km lap times when you were least expecting it. Of course, audio feedback is already more extensive than just lap times but, perhaps, audio features are not used by runners THAT widely.

Audio alerts DO ‘sound’ (aha, pun) a bit amateurish but, actually, I reckon they’re quite useful when you are going flat out you don’t want to have to raise your wrist or glance down at your segment progress on your bike computer. Well, I don’t do that. It seems that ‘just going for it’ might be the best way for a PB after all! However, I wouldn’t mind be selectively nagged during a one-minute STRAVA segment PB attempt…I mean, err, audio-coached.

If you use Siri or Google Assistant or Amazon through speakers at home or in your car, then it’s not hard to see that very soon sports watches could be usefully responsive to audio commands. “OK-Google…take a lap” being a simple example on a WearOS watch that could probably happen now…or you could press the button! But what if it’s raining and your touchscreen has gone AWOL…just sayin’.

Group Tech

You could see group tech as ‘social sharing’ like with STRAVA. But think about groups in a different way and how their sporty experience can be augmented.

Think of Sunday cycling groups. Why shouldn’t your rear-pointing radars and lights all work together to better alert the group about oncoming cars and better alerts cars with coordinated flashing? I think this might happen fairly soon, Edge devices can already support Bluetooth MESH networks and the most obvious SPORTY application for that technology has to be group light/radar control.

Why can’t rear-facing radar/lights also have proximity devices that detect fellow group riders getting dropped.

If you are running as a group then rather than just your position, why shouldn’t other stats be shared like heart rate or running power (w/kg) to help you spot the slackers?

Why can’t we sign our Garmin up to a race and periodically flash-upload lap stats to a centralised race portal? Widespread cellular support on our devices will help this in years to come.

Or we could just better share photos of cuddly cats as part of our social GROUPS 🙂 But you get the point that often innovation happens just for the sake of innovation and there are clearly many more social group innovations left to be made over and above ‘cute cat pictures’.

Solo Tech & Safety Tech

Clearly, there is a trend for gamification of solitary training where services like ZWIFT can make your treadmill experience part of a wider virtual group. That trend is obviously going to continue and the indoor side of it all has clearly been aided by Covid-19.

Watches currently have the ‘I’ve cracked my skull alert’ and the ‘someone’s following me alert’. For certain demographics that sort of functionality will hopefully become more widely available. Why not add an extra level of locational intelligence here to prompt the watch wearer “Hey…do you really want to run down THIS street at night”…ie there could be links to police crime databases or other types of geographic databases providing other kinds of intelligence based on your location.

I suspect the best way to come up with an idea in this realm is to see what apps already exist for smartphones and copy them…

Integration & Openness in a Connected World

There will be deeper integration of sports watches with their companion apps. Any sports service worth its salt will be open to key sources of data like Google FIT, Apple Health, Strava and Garmin Connect – and if the company can’t be bothered to do that then please at least provide Google Drive or Dropbox support so we can do it ourselves, elsewhere.

It’s relatively clear that HEALTH and activity data is becoming ever-more centralised in large, open repositories (Google, Apple). Those repositories obviously hold some sports data as well but will there ever be a time when Google/Apple is the first place we port our sports data to and then we use various other platforms to feed the source data from Google/Apple for our analyses and social interactions? I used to think that would happen but now I’m not so sure. STRAVA would be the most obvious platform to develop into a sports ‘data warehouse’ but they seem to be more interested in becoming the Facebook of sports rather than the Oracle of sport (Oracle made Data Warehouses back-in-the-day).

Mapping & Navigation

My most common command to my car’s navigation is, verbally, “Navigate me home” and I want that to take into account traffic delays, which it does. Sports navigational tech tries to do a lot of REALLY clever navigation stuff but I suspect that much of what they are trying to do is for a tiny number of people. None of the sports watches can get me home in the way that I use my car/smartphone. Maybe it’s just me?

My next most pressing navigation need is simply to follow a route I’ve grabbed from somewhere (say, Google maps) and, perhaps, to navigate me back on track when I get lost. Oh and to share it easily with somoene riding with me who has a different bike computer brand.

Clever routing algorithms exist to get you there in the easiest, fastest and shortest ways. Yep, even elevation gain can already be taken into account when a route is planned. This first step to calculate sensible routes is HARD to do well when all the other navigational ‘must-have’ features are also factored in eg different kinds of road surfaces on different grades of roads.

The larger sports data platforms also have the ability to route you over the most popular routes (Garmin, Google, Apple, Strava) and that ultimately relies on ‘people knowing best’ rather than ‘tech knowing best’. For most sporty routing experiences, I suspect that POPULARITY ROUTING is all we need. Yet this is a challenge for someone like, say, Hammerhead or Suunto to implement as I suspect they don’t have the volume of data that Garmin does. So they ultimately have to either pay for it from a 3rd party or offer a service based on limited-popularity routing…a similar scenario was with Google Maps’ satellite images, which used to be free until Google started charging companies to use it to serve to you. #BarriertoEntry.

“OK Garmin, navigate me home”…soon.

Seamless Google Maps integration…maybe

Processor Tech

Much of the details here are beyond my inclination to get to grips with them.

Expect to see the increased capability of individual chips. For example, an OHR chip (Valencell) might also include an accelerometer and a fundamental processor like the Wear OS Snapdragon 4100 (2020/1) from Qualcomm may well boast GNSS capability as well as moving Wear OS from 32bit to 64bit. Multi-purpose chips potentially can make production easier as well as reducing power consumption. 64 bit is faster 😉


Weather sensors and connectivity to weather services are generally already quite good. I was recently impressed with the MyRadar app on WearOS which graphically shows incoming weather fronts on a map on my watch. Try doing that on a Garmin screen without a smartphone connected to the net.

I want to see more forecast info offered around the wind. The wind speed/direction is often hidden away in a forecast. As a cyclist, wind is often as important to me as rain…I try to avoid excesses of both in equal measure. Yet if I am on a STRAVA segment day then the exact wind knowledge can be rather helpful, maybe I could even receive a daily text/email/alert to alert me of favourable, predicted wind conditions on my starred segments. Of course, products can already show forecasted wind AND ACTUAL headwind eg from AeroPod but why can’t Velocomp (AeroPod) produce a smaller wind sensor and it might later be interesting for someone to collate actual wind strengths and directions compared to forecast to take into account/predict local disturbances of strength/direction.


I suppose you can already turn on your fridge whilst running if you have the right pieces of kit and an IFTTT account. You can do a lot of things you don’t really need to with tech.

Novel Sensor Support

This requires the ‘novel sensor’ to exist. Thus we are still waiting for sporty, PRACTICAL hydration sensors (AURA), Carb/Fat usage (Lumen), blood pressure (OMRON Heart Guide) and blood glucose sensors (Libre) to actually exist. Garmin can already connect to them BTW…CIQ

This also includes connecting to existing sensors in novel ways. Thus Wahoo’s ‘hand off’ from the Rival to the ELEMNT bike computer is a novel way to use the ELEMNT.

Sport Specificity

Garmin has the ability to iterate subtle variants of the Fenix series across multiple ‘sports’ like Marine usage (Quatix) and I also expect them to iterate bike devices to MTB, track and Cyclocross (trail or gravel).

Other manufacturers generally seem to be iterating technical variants of products eg introducing ‘navigation’ or STRAVA to a bike computer doesn’t especially target a sport. One strategy for Garmin’s competitors is to target specific sports with a specific watch/bike computer but I doubt we will see much of that – although Lezyne is an interesting exception who generally target off-road usage. Garmin is very clearly aware of that and I would imagine could cause Lezyne some big problems if they decided to compete more seriously in the same arena.

Image Recording

There’s probably a sports watch that can already take a photo and share it to your STRAVA feed. Xplova integrated video recording to their bikenav a few years ago along a similar vein. It’s already technically possible, there just has to be the commercial will to match whatever demand exists.

The question here is to what degree imagery capturing needs to be integrated onto a small sports device rather than being augmented instead by the athlete carrying a secondary device (drone/GoPro). If I think of the 30 or so people that I regularly follow on STRAVA (who I actually know in real life) then only one of them adds the occasional image to a ride.

Workout Data Standards

I think the FIT file format is now a de-facto standard, although technical communication between platforms may well use JSON or TCX. But you don’t need to know that. You’d be surprised at how many newly released devices (non-Garmin) produce FIT files with schema errors, you’d be surprised at how many of those errors exist two years later. Or maybe you wouldn’t.

Reader-Powered Content

This content is not sponsored. It's mostly me behind the labour of love which is this site, meaning it's entirely reader-powered content ❤️ I'd really appreciate it if you'd follow, subscribe or consider getting me an e-Coffee ❤️ Alternatively please buy the reviewed product via (which costs you no extra) and, for that, I receive a small commission. Thank you!
Support this site with purchases at these partners - should click to a local choice in your country


click here to discover more

Most people think of running as a solo venture. And while runners appreciate ( read : need ) quality “me time, ” there’s something quite powerful about running in a pack.

“Most of the time people join groups for the social experience, but the cool thing about a course group is that you can be a part of it without saying a word, ” says Scott Miller, founder of the Boulder Trail Running Breakfast Club. “It’s a great opportunity to connect. ”

Here, Miller plus five other course club founders, share tips for building—and sustaining—your own running club.

Jessamy Little, who founded the Cass Runners Club, a 100-plus person course group in London comprised of her business school classmates, suggests asking potential members what days, times, and locations work best with their schedules. Some groups may favor an early morning sweat sesh, while others may prefer meeting after work. “A recommendation for a newer club is to have two set running days, ” Little says. “One during the week that is more focused on ‘getting it done’ and one on weekends that can have a more ‘fun and footloose’ vibe. ” For Little’s group, the weekend runs were geared toward exploring new areas of the city.

“Don’t get discouraged if not a lot of people show up at first, ” says Marnie Kunz, founder of Runstreet, an NYC-based company that leads art runs—urban runs that pass by street art in cities across the U. S. When Kunz held her first art run in 2015, just one person came : a man on a bike. Kunz was disappointed, embarrassed, and considered canceling the whole thing. But the next week a few more people showed up, and then a few more. Soon, word got out. Runstreet has since hosted more than 200 runs in cities around the country “Realizing that everyone starts from scratch really helps, ” Kunz says.

Kunz stresses the importance of having your own website that houses all information about your runs along with photos. “Social media platforms can change—and not everyone is on every platform—so it helps to have everything in one place. ” Keep your communication consistent across platforms to help create a streamlined brand.

Let people know what they are getting themselves into, Miller says. His Boulder, Colorado-based group of 100-plus members meets every Saturday for a long trail run ( anywhere between two to six hours ) followed by a group breakfast. Because the group’s runs cover a wide range of terrain, he wrote several articles explaining the general types of conditions runners can expect and the group’s approximate pace along with safety tips.

The articles are published on the group’s MeetUp page, and when a new person signs up, Miller sends them the reading material. “If your group is not a beginner group, you need to make that clear, ” Miller says. “You don’t want people to show up and have a bad time. I try to be really descriptive about the time, en ligne, and elevation of our runs so people know what they are in for. ”

Many members of Miller’s group take photos during the runs and post them to the group’s page. He says it helps draw new members. “When people are looking for a course group and they see pictures of runs in amazing areas, people smiling—both men and women—they see that it’s a mixed group that likes to be social and have fun. ”

Frankie Ruiz, cofounder of the Miami Marathon and founder of the Baptist Health South Florida Brickell Run Club, a free, once-a-week, Miami-based group of about 400 runners, can count on one hand the number of times he’s cancelled runs throughout the program’s nine-year tenure.

“Our main message is that we don’t cancel, ” he says. “If it’s really rough out, we’ll go to a stationnement garage or go indoors and do a core séance. ” He says this has helped build the club’s reputation as a consistent amenity offered by the city. “Even if a runner doesn’t show up, I think there’s a comfort knowing that there is something in your city that doesn’t stop. ”

“If you have new people coming in, you can’t assume that they know the rules and guidelines, ” Ruiz says. “Communication needs to be all the time. ” Even though the group’s “weather-proof policy” may be well understood among current members, every time the skies get gloomy, the club blasts their social channels with reminders that the runs are still on. It also helps to communicate the planned route, distance, and pace in advance so that new members can plan their fuel and attire accordingly.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *